"Men are very sensitive, but well protected. This is also demonstrated in our biology. We go out into new environments and analyze or force them to be safe enough for the softee chicks to hang out in. Then we sex with them until the environment changes or we feel awesome or curious enough to go into new environments.

Women take care of the interior portion? Tell me, women. Maybe they partially decide who to favor in the society and which acts to sponsor."


I will give you the long version of what I have said. To translate between these two statements should help you understand what people mean more eloquently.

Men are very sensitive to social changes and situations. But they are very well protected by their independence, physical strength, comparative social positions, and social expectations. This protection makes them care less about many subtle social situations, such as shoes, that women spend much time on.

This is also demonstrated in our biology. Men have usually soft yet sensitive genitalia, which they are able to protect excellently usually with their physical abilities.

Using these social and physical strengths, men venture into areas that woman do not as frequently go, such as dark alleyways or social expression and entertainment that is unsure or not backed by the group power, strength and social relativism, of others.

We analyze these environments, trying new things and new social organizations, as well protected knights in ways that women are soft and vulnerable. If we find these environments excellent or fertile or suitable for enjoyment, we prosper there or let others know that the environments are good, and vulnerable women can expand their social horizons into those areas that previous only men, or nobody went to.

Men spend a lot of time exploring or readying or learning from and enjoying these environments. It might be a new kind of game, a social gesture, a musical style, a new dance. Men by their social and physical place are better equipped to try new things and introduce them to women than women are to explore them themselves.

These new areas are the 'exterior' which men sometimes inhabit. The 'interior' which women frequently inhabit is common and known society. Shoes.

Women may select among men by choosing which men and which groups and which new things to favor, backing up those men they select and encouraging them to return to the exterior to explore yet more new things.


original:
"Men are very sensitive, but well protected. This is also demonstrated in our biology. We go out into new environments and analyze or force them to be safe enough for the softee chicks to hang out in. Then we sex with them until the environment changes or we feel awesome or curious enough to go into new environments.

Women take care of the interior portion? Tell me, women. Maybe they partially decide who to favor in the society and which acts to sponsor."

======

Results:

This has been the way of man/woman social place for millenia. Exploration and gentrification, both being tied to the process.

But women are becoming more able to explore like men, and men are becoming *far* more able to explore and not requiring the help or support of women to such a great degree. This does not lead to ahererosexual lifestyles. It leads to advanced heterosexual lifestyles without the identical gender roles.

Exploration used to be a commodity in the world and produce Now it is being replaced, and breaking new ground is no longer available, and breaking new ground is no longer a very productive pursuit, nor should nor does it produce seniority. Seniority itself is being broken. May it be destroyed, and may we be free.

What we really want is more important than seniority. If we want, sex is more important than reproduction, although having babies is something that we also can want. This will lead to new things and new methods of social function.

I expect to see Sharia break down, or destabilize upwards and then collapse. Let this be for 2008, 2009. The center hub of that wheel is breaking in terms of sex. May the society hub of Sharia be strong and work intelligently and freely.

Social quality is something that we still value.

They who have said that violence is required and intelligence cannot win, see that Sharia is breaking and that it is possible to help the Arabs and Persians change. The ways of these intolerant apocalyptic gods are not absolute, and they are wrong.